Article pretty good except for obvious mistakes you really need to get a reviewer. wikipedia article actually goes into more indepth and has lots more sources 46 of them! you need to do your research it is pathetic by compare. still i know you are just hobbies so cant expect a proffessional job.
Writing was o.k. excpet in parts, honestly Bill I think Matt is holding you back, I read along and then a real crap. after reading the story i know how to recognize it for what it is you need to go solo my friend.
all in all not bad for hobbies, though no offense i have read much better.
Article pretty good except for obvious mistakes you really need to get a reviewer. wikipedia article actually goes into more indepth and has lots more sources 46 of them! you need to do your research it is pathetic by compare. still i know you are just hobbies so cant expect a proffessional job.
Writing was o.k. excpet in parts, honestly Bill I think Matt is holding you back, I read along and then a real crap. after reading the story i know how to recognize it for what it is you need to go solo my friend.
all in all not bad for hobbies, though no offense i have read much better.